LOS ANGELES — The Republican Party of California met in convention last weekend and listened to five candidates for governor and United States senator in the state's June 8 primary election. They fell all over themselves trying to sound like tea partiers.
The Los Angeles Times reported it this way:
"Some ... have more money than others. Some are better known. Some are more in sync with their party's traditional values. But what all five have in common is a determination to tap what they see as public fury over the failures of government."
The candidates for governor are Meg Whitman, former chief executive of eBay (more money) and State Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner (much more money).
The candidates for senator are Carly Fiorina, former chief executive of Hewlett-Packard (more money), former Rep. Tom Campbell (more in sync) and Orange County Assemblyman Chuck DeVore (less money and out-of-sync).
"We are all members of the 'Had Enough' party," said Fiorina, who hopes to win the nomination to run against Sen. Barbara Boxer. DeVore, same ambition, promised to "rescue America." Poizner, who hopes to succeed retiring Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, said he would send the National Guard and the California Highway Patrol to the border with Mexico to block illegal immigrants.
Assuming they have some understanding of history, the primary winners will undoubtedly moderate their views for the November elections against the Democratic candidates, Boxer and presumably former governor and current Attorney General Jerry Brown, so old he's new. But right now the opposition is all anger all the time. The convention in Santa Clara reminded me not of Republicans but of another candidate with more money, Ross Perot, when he ran for president in 1992 — or perhaps, I should say, elected Bill Clinton in 1992.
Perot, same anger, different views, spent $65.4 million of his own money and got 19 percent of the vote that year. Exit polls indicated that his votes came from Republicans and Democrats in about equal numbers. But anyone who lived through that campaign had no doubt he wrecked President George H.W. Bush. Profiles of the Perot vote looked pretty tea party-like: with 20 percent of his votes coming from self-described liberals, 27 percent from self-described conservatives and 53 percent coming from self-described moderates. Economically, however, the majority of Perot voters (57 percent) were middle class, earning between $15,000 and $49,000 annually.
Clinton won that election with only 43 percent of the vote. Bush had 37 percent and Perot had his 19 percent. That 19 could be a magic number. Right now, self-proclaimed tea partiers account for about 19 percent of the electorate, at least in polls.
Ideologically, Perot was often scattershot and confusing, but he was not a tea partier. He was angry, a protectionist on trade and an anti-Washington budget-balancer. But he was also pro-choice and argued for gun control. Most important, he looked forward, while the tea partiers are looking backward. His most important difference with the folks who could be called his political descendants was a view of the Constitution.
Tea partiers, whether or not they have read it, see our founding document as a sacred text to be taken as literally as many on the religious right see the Bible. Perot, on the other hand said:
"Keep in mind our Constitution predates the Industrial Revolution. Our founders did not know about electricity, the train, telephones, radio, television, automobiles, airplanes, rockets, nuclear weapons, satellites or space exploration. There's a lot they didn't know about. It would be interesting to see what kind of document they'd draft today. Just keeping it frozen in time won't hack it."
Republican candidates, and not just here, must know they are playing with fire in trying to co-opt or assimilate the tea partiers. And as much as all this activity on the political right is energizing conservatives, they also have to realize that the end result could very well be the easy re-election of President Obama — say, with 43 percent of the vote.
LOS ANGELES — Thousands of California students, from graduate students to kindergarten kids, walked out of their classrooms last Thursday to peacefully (mostly) demonstrate against the decline of education in the Golden State. Could this be the start of something big? Something bigger than tea bags?
WASHINGTON — What killed bipartisanship in the governing of America? Basically, I think, it was the jet plane and Blackberries. In fact, those two mechanical marvels may break up the whole nation into, say, 350 million countries. A country for every man, woman and child.
BOSTON — In an obituary of Alexander Haig, The New York Times wrote: "He was a rare American breed: a political general."
LOS ANGELES — My favorite Tea Party guy is Merle Firestone from Rainbow, Miss., who left home at 4 a.m. last Saturday morning to drive to Nashville. He left a note on the coffeepot for his wife saying he wanted to hear Sarah Palin at the "National Convention" of the "Tea Party." He could not afford a $300 ticket to get into the auditorium at the Gaylord Opryland Hotel, but he thought he might get a glimpse of the former Alaska governor.
LOS ANGELES — First the news: Barack Obama is a hell of a speaker. His first State of the Union message will not change history, but it was a skillful balancing act between the winds of change he wants to ride and the sour and contradictory winds of discontent blowing across the United States.
WASHINGTON — When Barack Obama of Illinois first walked into the Capitol of the United States as a senator-elect in 2004, he was greeted with the usual bowing and scraping that senators take for granted in those hallowed halls. His wife was stunned, saying, as I recall: "What will they do if you actually achieve something?"
PHILADELPHIA — In February of 1961, President Kennedy asked this question of Jawaharlal Nehru, the prime minister of India: "What do you think of the idea of our Peace Corps?"
DENVER — All of your adult life it seems you are told that you are your own doctor. You don't believe that, or perhaps, just don't think about it, until there inevitably comes a time when you have to spend a good deal of time with physicians.
WASHINGTON — Harry Reid, you may have noticed, is not a very colorful fellow. Among the interesting things you can say about him is that he is the first Capitol police officer to become a senator working in that same building.
LOS ANGELES — It's the time of year when college instructors grade papers. Having done this for more than 10 years at the Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism here at the University of Southern California, I would offer this general rule: Students usually think they deserve a half-grade better than what they get. Give them a B, they think they should have gotten a B-plus.
WASHINGTON — So, our extraordinarily rational and articulate president went to Norway to receive the Nobel Peace Prize and identified himself as a wartime commander-in-chief. True, but he neglected to mention that his nation is not at war.
WASHINGTON — Barack Obama says a lot of smart things. During his campaign last year, in his second debate with Sen. John McCain, in Nashville, he closed by saying:
LOS ANGELES — California, contrary to popular opinion, is not broke. It's only crazy, mean and at war with itself.
LOS ANGELES — It has become fashionable on both the left and the right to compare the United States to ancient Rome. Decline and fall: We are a militaristic power trying to make everyone else in the known world submit to our way, or we are an irreligious, hedonistic bunch going the way of all flesh. Or maybe both.
LOS ANGELES — Most of what you read, see and hear about Afghanistan is not meant for you. The words, optimistic and pessimistic, right and wrong, all the leaks, all the numbers of troop estimates, costs and polls are aimed at an audience of one: the president.
LOS ANGELES — Was George Santayana right when he said that those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it?